Self Efficacy and Metacognition Learning Inventory- Science (SEMLI-S)
The tool assesses students' metacognition, self-efficacy and constructivist science learning processes.
Average Review: (4.0)
Supplemental Information:
n/aAssessment Type:
30-item closed-ended questionsScale:
5-point Likert scale (1 = never or almost never; 2 = sometimes; 3 = about half the time; 4 = frequently; 5 = always or almost always)Publication Date:
Dec 02, 2010Respondent:
465 students of forms two to seven (13-18 years of age)Domain(s) Evaluated:
Attitude / BehaviorSample items:
1) I seek to connect what I learn from out-of-class science activities (e.g. field trips or science museum visits) with what happens in the science class.2) I adjust my level of concentration to suit different science subjects.
Reliability:
Correlation coefficient among the subscales ranged between .29 to .58.Validity:
An Item Factor Analysis on five constructs were calculated. a) Constructive connectivity- .84, b) Monitoring-.84, c) Science learning self-efficacy-.85, d) Learning risk awareness-.77, e) Control of concentration-.68.Frequency:
RarelyAdministration time:
15 minutesRequires a Computer:
NoRequires Internet Access:
NoPrimary reference:
Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of students' metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701-1724.Comments:
Ajaja, O. P., & Agboro-Eravwoke, U. O. (2017). Collection and Analysis of Students' Metacognitive Orientations for Science Learning: A Survey of Science Classrooms in Delta State, Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 1-20.The tool is also available in Chinese.
Other Reference:
Thomas, G. P. (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7) 1183-1207.
The study made use of SEMLI-S, however it does not report or analyze validity or reliability of the measure.
STEM Criteria
Science
YesTechnology
NoEngineering
NoMath
NoLearn how to Obtain this Assessment Tool
Contact
Gregory Thomas: Univ. of Alberta gthomas1@ualberta.ca David Anderson Univ. of British Columbia david.anderson@ubc.ca Samson Nashon Univ. of British Columbia samson.nashon@ubc.ca
Gregory Thomas: Univ. of Alberta gthomas1@ualberta.ca David Anderson Univ. of British Columbia david.anderson@ubc.ca Samson Nashon Univ. of British Columbia samson.nashon@ubc.ca