Self Efficacy and Metacognition Learning Inventory- Science (SEMLI-S)

The tool assesses students' metacognition, self-efficacy and constructivist science learning processes.

Average Review: 4 (4.0)

Supplemental Information:

n/a

Assessment Type:

30-item closed-ended questions

Scale:

5-point Likert scale (1 = never or almost never; 2 = sometimes; 3 = about half the time; 4 = frequently; 5 = always or almost always)

Publication Date:

Dec 02, 2010

Respondent:

465 students of forms two to seven (13-18 years of age)

Domain(s) Evaluated:

Attitude / Behavior

Sample items:

1) I seek to connect what I learn from out-of-class science activities (e.g. field trips or science museum visits) with what happens in the science class.
2) I adjust my level of concentration to suit different science subjects.

Reliability:

Correlation coefficient among the subscales ranged between .29 to .58.

Validity:

An Item Factor Analysis on five constructs were calculated. a) Constructive connectivity- .84, b) Monitoring-.84, c) Science learning self-efficacy-.85, d) Learning risk awareness-.77, e) Control of concentration-.68.

Frequency:

Rarely

Administration time:

15 minutes

Requires a Computer:

No

Requires Internet Access:

No

Primary reference:

Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of students' metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701-1724.

Comments:

Ajaja, O. P., & Agboro-Eravwoke, U. O. (2017). Collection and Analysis of Students' Metacognitive Orientations for Science Learning: A Survey of Science Classrooms in Delta State, Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 1-20.

The tool is also available in Chinese.

Other Reference:
Thomas, G. P. (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7) 1183-1207.

The study made use of SEMLI-S, however it does not report or analyze validity or reliability of the measure.

STEM Criteria

Science

Yes

Technology

No

Engineering

No

Math

No
Learn how to Obtain this Assessment Tool
Contact

Gregory Thomas: Univ. of Alberta gthomas1@ualberta.ca David Anderson Univ. of British Columbia david.anderson@ubc.ca Samson Nashon Univ. of British Columbia samson.nashon@ubc.ca